Sunday, September 7, 2008

Sarah Palin Alaska Governor Jury Rights Day

State of Alaska > Governor > News > News Details


WHEREAS, September 5, 2007, will mark the 337th anniversary of the day when the jury, in the trial of William Penn, refused to convict him of violating England’s Conventicle Acts, despite clear evidence that he acted illegally by preaching a Quaker sermon to his congregation.

WHEREAS, by refusing to apply what they determined was an unjust law, the Penn jury not only served justice, but provided a basis for the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment rights of freedom of speech, religion, and peaceable assembly.

WHEREAS, September 5th, 2007, also commemorates the day when four of Penn’s jurors began nine weeks of incarceration for finding him not guilty. Their later release and exoneration established forever the English and American legal doctrine that it is the right and responsibility of the trial jury to decide on matters of law and fact.

WHEREAS, the Sixth and Seventh Amendments are included in the Bill of Rights to preserve the right to trial by jury, which in turn conveys upon the jury the responsibility to defend, with its verdict, all other individual rights enumerated or implied by the U.S. Constitution, including its Amendments.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Sarah Palin, Governor of the State of Alaska, do hereby proclaim September 5, 2007, as:

Jury Rights Day

in Alaska, in recognition of the integral role the jury, as an institution, plays in our legal system.

Dated: August 31, 2007

Printed on 8/29/08 at 6:40:23 PM by 69.178.10.29

Sunday, May 25, 2008

R-Kids-et al Demand Grand Jury Judges Gone Wild

Visit Our Constitutional-Friendly Websites:

http://www.judgeourcourts.org/

http://www.rkids.org/ http://www.upro.us/

www.United-We-Stand.org



JUDGES GONE WILD

Last week, we were dismayed (but not surprised) when the California Supreme Court overturned the will of 60 percent of California voters in the latest episode of Judges Gone Wild. This is yet another example of out-of-control judges overturning the will of the people. These judges have no regard for the fact that they work for the people and they completely disregard the rule of law when it suits their social agenda. It is time we removed judges who set themselves up as kings and dictators over the people.

These judges have violated the office of trust they hold with the people of California. They have ignored the will of the people, they have overstepped their authority and they have imposed the tyrannical rule of elites on the free people of California. We will stay on this issue. The fight to protect our God-given freedoms from the tyranny of the few was why we stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Judge Moore, why we have worked for the impeachment of judges in various states and why we were heavily involved in the process surrounding the recent U.S. Supreme Court vacancies. This is a fight worth fighting. This is a fight we must win. Or our children will not be free.

Another aspect of the California decision that I have yet to hear in the press is how this will affect the presidential elections. If you recall in 2004, many voters in Ohio were driven to the polls by the judicial issue and Ohio was a key state that decided the 2004 presidential election. Deep in the heart of America, when a judge violates the trust the people have placed in him, the people are motivated. The next president of the United States could choose three or four members of the U.S. Supreme Court and many, many lower judges. And these judges will be with us long after the next president leaves the White House.

We cannot afford to stay home. We must vote. The stakes are too high to abandon our Christian duty to select our leaders. If we do forego our duty to vote, our nation will suffer for generations to come.


sciplining judges….to the judges!

Legislature is ignoring their duty under our

state Constitution to discipline corrupt judges

The Minnesota Constitution: Article Six, Section Nine authorizes the Legislature to discipline the

judges. But the Legislature refuses, and gave the job of disciplining judges….to the

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Judge Ed Cleary,circumventing GJ-Aaron Foster?


also found at
Thanks John to post on SPIF
Hi All,

Just a quick update on the Judge's order today on the motions for defendant Aaron Foster.

Judge, Edward J. Cleary made the following orders on the different motions after evidence was given on March 20th and March 24, 2008.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion of the Defendant to dismiss the indictment for denial of Defendant’s right to a speedy trial and to due process of law is DENIED.

2. The motion of the Defendant to dismiss the indictment for destruction of exculpatory evidence is DENIED.

3. The motion of the Defendant to suppress evidence obtained by search and seizure at 368 Dorland is GRANTED IN PART.

4. The motion of the Defendant to suppress evidence obtained by search and seizure of the Defendant is DENIED.

5. The motion of the Defendant to suppress a statement made by the Defendant is GRANTED IN PART.

Last page (Page 29).

"Nevertheless, for the reasons stated, the Court is denying the Defendant’s motions to dismiss and granting, in part, Defendant’s motions to suppress evidence."

EJC (Judge, Edward J. Cleary)

A link to the full order can be obtained at:

http://www.mncourts.gov/Documents/2/Public/Criminal_Court/Aaron%20Foster%20ORDER%20on%20motions%20to%20dismiss%20and%20suppress.pdf

The trial for Aaron Foster for 3rd degree murder starts on May 22, 2008 for the murder of Barbara Winn.

This case is going to be very interesting as it involves the St. Paul Police Department and Maplewood Police Departments and their respective roles and their actions or inaction.

My heart really goes out to the Barbara Winn family. As I sat in the courtroom listening to the evidence being given, I couldn't help thinking of the other lives that were lost that day along with Barbara Winn. The children lost a mother and their children lost a grandmother. Barbara Winn’s family lost a sister and a daughter. A lot was lost in a moment of domestic violence. The warning signs were there, but some failed to act in their official capacity.

There is a new Domestic Violence Center being built in the Ramsey County Courthouse (Room 140). This center is designed as a one-stop shop for individuals who are victims of domestic violence and need help.

Cold cases like this are difficult for both the Defendant and the State. Thankfully there is no statute of limitations on murder.


John Krenik
Highland Park, St. Paul, Minnesota

John Krenik
Highland Park, St. Paul, Minnesota
Info about John Krenik:
http://forums.e-democracy.org/contacts/johnkrenik

This topic's messages may be viewed at: http://forums.e-democracy.org/r/topic/3G94xiK5vFE8cMy28Omxdv
-----------------------------------------



Sharons-Memory's

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=

Imprisoning Victims Of Domestic Violence

Can the police force a victim to testify against her will? Read more »


Forwarded in good faith with Thanks to the Winn Family to educate on Slide Sbhows
ECF_ P165913 Pacer sa1299 /s/ Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Scarrella
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr08
RockYou.com - photo sharing, MySpace slideshows, MySpace codes, MySpace music
Sharon4AttorneyGeneral2009 DisciplinaryBradley C. RhodesAitkinCoAttorney, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com Title Search's http://sharon4council.blogspot.com Candidate http://sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm

No direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937)
Anderson + Advocates http://taxthemax.blogspot.com
Bio for Sharon Anderson Sharon&JR HomelessBlogBrief
SASC 1988Brief15pdf All cases published on this site are in the public domain Intellectual property - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Anderson + Advocates
Disclaimer: The people behind are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site ,
Private attorney general - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.
Sharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money Laundering Sharon-E-Dem-fcc
Image:WritPro06 26.pdf - Wikimedia Commons


Grand Jurys

Grand Jurys